The Quimby Manuscripts
Chapter 12 MRS. EDDY: 1862-1875 (1)
(1)
Fourteen of Mrs. Eddy's personal letters were found with the "Quimby
Manuscripts." While we are not at liberty to print the text of these
letters, it may be said that they corroborate the statements made in this
chapter and elsewhere regarding the relations of Mrs. Eddy to Dr. Quimby and
her acceptance of his theories.
We
have noted the fact that Mrs. Eddy, then Mrs. Patterson, was a patient under Dr.
Quimby's care during the period of his practice in Portland. At that time Mrs.
Eddy was recovering from invalidism of long standing. Hence she was greatly
handicapped at first. She had firmly believed in doctors and medicine, and
accepted the conventional teachings in regard to disease. But while burdened
with these allegiances she also possessed a strong desire to make the change to
the new point of view as thoroughly and quickly as possible. To understand her
relationship to Dr. Quimby and his teachings we need then to put ourselves
appreciatively into the point of view of her inner life.
Dr.
D. Patterson, Mrs. Eddy's husband, became interested in the new method of haling
and urged his wife to consult Dr. Quimby. Two of his letters to Dr. Quimby have
been preserved and are here printed in full.
DR.
D. PATTERSON TO P. P. QUIMBY
No. 1
Rumney,
N. H., Oct. 14, 1861.
DEAR
SIR: I have heard that you
intended to come to Concord, N. H. this fall to stop a while for the benefit of
the suffering portion of our race: do you intend, and if so, how soon? My wife
has been an invalid for a number of years; is not able to sit up but a little,
and we wish to have the benefit of your wonderful power in her case.
If you are soon coming to Concord I shall carry her up to you, and if you
Please write me at your earliest convenience and oblige, Yours truly,
(Address) DR. D. PATTERSON,
RUMNEY, N.H.
No.
2
No. 76 UNION ST., LYNN, MASS. Apl. 24th, 1865.
Dr.
P. P. Quimby.
DEAR
SIR: My wife arrived safely Sat. eve., and is greatly improved in her health,
but says she did not settle with you. If you will send your bill by mail, I will
send the balance due you by the same conveyance.
The first of these letters is especially important since it gives the date of the request for Dr. Quimby's treatment. Dr. Quimby's circular (1) deeply interested Mrs. Eddy and as he was unable to leave his practice in Portland to visit Mrs. Eddy in New Hampshire, Mrs. Eddy wrote personal appeals from Rumney, and from a water cure in Hill, N. H., whither she had gone for treatment but without avail. It is plain that Mrs. Eddy had now reached the limit of endurance and the end of her faith in material methods of treatment. No record of Dr. Quimby's answer has been preserved, but doubtless he wrote to her with all the more interest and conviction in view of the fact that she had given up hope in all other directions. For under such conditions he anticipated the best results.
(1)
See page 150.
There
is no record of the exact date of Mrs. Eddy's arrival in Portland, but one of
Dr. Quimby's patients, still living, was present in the office when she came and
distinctly remembers seeing the invalid assisted up the steps to his office. In
the journal of Mr. Julius A. Dresser, under date of October 17, 1862, mention is
made for the first time of this new patient, who manifested special interest in
Dr. Quimby's teaching and was eager to converse with the patients who best
understood the new theory. Mr. Dresser
devoted the larger part of his time at that period to conversations with
patients, and it was natural that he should talk at length with Mrs. Eddy. These
conversations were highly important because they gave Mrs. Eddy her first
connected idea of Quimby's great truth.
First of all, Mr. Dresser could speak with the conviction of one whose life had been saved at the point of death with typhoid pneumonia. Again, he had seen the results in hundreds of cases, since his own cure in June, 1860, and could substantiate whatever he said by describing the conditions and the appearance of patients when they first came for treatment and by telling how great were the changes wrought by Quimby's wisdom. Mrs. Eddy indicated her increasing interest in this "wisdom," and her desire to read a statement of it in Quimby's own words. Accordingly Mr. Dresser loaned her Vol: 1 of the manuscripts, as he possessed a copy in his own handwriting, this copy having been preserved with the others until the present time. (1)
The
turning-point with Mrs. Eddy, as with all who came to Dr. Quimby, was of course
the silent spiritual treatment which she received at regular intervals during
her stay in Portland. Dr. Quimby always depended primarily on this silent work
to bring about the fundamental or decisive change, to overcome the adverse
influences and start the reaction in favor of health. In Mrs. Eddy's case there
were years of invalidism to overcome, together with the beliefs and habits which
bound her to another mode of life. Hence a gradual change in consciousness and
attitude followed upon the remarkable effects of the silent treatment which
lifted her out of her invalidism. To understand what Dr. Quimby accomplished for her we should not only
bear in mind that the silent treatment took her past the decisive point, but
note that the conversations were in their way no less essential, and that these
were made good by the many opportunities to listen to the reading of
manuscripts, to hear discussions and to read the manuscripts herself. We have
the direct testimony of those who were present during the conversations and
readings in the office to the effect that Mrs. Eddy showed unusual eagerness to
acquire all she could through these exceptional opportunities. Indeed her zeal
seems at
After
her return from Portland to Sanbornton Bridge (1863) she was not sure of herself
in all respects and found it necessary to send for absent treatment on occasion,
but she had begun to care for the sick by Quimby's method. Later, at Warren,
Maine, (1864) she acquired the power to detect others' feelings and atmospheres,
had become accustomed to the feeling of Quimby's presence during absent
treatments and had advanced to knowledge of that presence when there was no
apparent reason for his coming.
It
was at Warren that Mrs. Eddy gave her first public lectures expounding Quimby's
views. She felt impelled to give these lectures because she found herself
classified as a spiritualist and a public denial seemed necessary-she disclaimed
any connection with phenomena involving rappings, trances; or any agency in
healing the sick said to come from the dead, and contrasted Quimby's science of
healing with Rochester rappings, spiritualism and deism in general. Her remarks
attracted attention and a newspaper editor asked her for a communication on the
subject.
Throughout
this period, from the time of her acquaintance with Dr. Quimby by reputation and
then as her healer in Portland and by means of "angel visits," Mrs.
Eddy looked up to Quimby as the great discoverer and healer of the day, the one
whose privilege it was to rediscover the truth which Jesus taught. She felt and
expressed the profound gratitude and loyalty of one who had been marvellously
restored to health. She made no claims for herself. She did not make light of
Quimby's teaching or identify it with either mesmerism, magnetism or any other
of the isms of the day, as we shall soon see more plainly, in her communication
to a Portland paper. In fact, she showed herself more than an ardent disciple;
she was eager to come to Quimby's defense, lest he should be misunderstood and
classed with the isms and humbugs then current.
In
order to depreciate Mrs. Eddy's indebtedness to Dr.
SONNET.
Suggested
by Reading the Remarkable Cure of Captain F. W Deering (1)
For the Courier.
TO DR. P. P. QUIMBY
'Mid
light of science sits the sage profound,
Awing with classics and his starry lore,
Climbing to Venus, chasing Saturn round,
Turning his mystic pages o'er and o'er,
Till, from empyrean space, his wearied sight
Turns to the oasis on which to gaze,
More bright than glitters on the brow of night
The self-taught man walking in wisdom's ways.
Then paused the captive gaze with peace entwined,
And sight was satisfied with thee to dwell;
But not in classics could the book-worm find
That law of excellence whence came the spell
Potent o'er all,-the captive to unbind.
To heal the sick and faint, the halt and blind.
MARY M. PATTERSON.
(1)
Printed
from the original manuscript preserved by George A. Quimby. See Appendix.
The
confessions of weakness were evidences of the regerative work in process, as she
realizes when it comes to her that to see the great new truth and to live by it
consciously are two different things. For the mere restoration to physical
health was only the beginning. There remained the great problem of a temperament
which made her unduly aware of the ills and feelings of others. The problem of
one's temperament is not to be solved in a week. Hence
The
following is from Mrs. Eddy's article published in the Portland Evening
Courier in 1862. It plainly shows the writer's real attitude toward her
restorer.
"When
our Shakespeare decided that `there were more things in this world than were
dreamed of in your philosophy,' I cannot say of a verity that he had a
foreknowledge of P. P. Quimby. And when the school Platonic anatomized the soul
and divided it into halves, to be reunited by elementary attractions, and
heathen philosophers averred that old Chaos in sullen silence blooded o'er the
earth until her inimitable form was hatched from the egg of night, I would not
at present decide whether the fallacy was found in their premises or
conclusions, never having dated my existence be fore the flood. When the
startled alchemist discovered, as be supposed, an universal solvent, or the
philosopher's stone, and the more daring Archimedes invented a lever wherewithal
to pry up the universe, I cannot say that in either the principle obtained in
nature or in art, or that it worked well, having never tried it. But, when by a
falling apple an immutable law was discovered, we gave it the crown of science,
which is incontrovertible and capable of demonstration: hence that was wisdom
and truth. When from the evidence of the senses my reason takes cognizance of
truth, although it may appear in quite a miraculous view, I must acknowledge
that as science which is truth uninvestigated. Hence the following demonstration:-
"Three
weeks since I quitted my nurse and sick-room en route for Portland.
The belief of my recovery had died out of the hearts of those who were
most anxious for it. With this mental and physical depression I first visited P. P.
Quimby; and in less than one week from that time I ascended
"Is
it spiritualism. Listen to the words of wisdom. `Believe in God, believe also in
me; or believe me for the very work's sake.' Now, then, his works are but the
result of superior wisdom, which can demonstrate a science not understood:
hence it were a doubtful proceeding not to believe him for the work's sake.
Well, then, he denies that his power to heal the sick is borrowed from the
spirits of this or another world; and let us take the Scriptures for proof. `A kingdom divided against itself cannot stand.' How, then, can he
receive the friendly aid of the disenthralled spirit, while he rejects the faith
of the solemn mystic who crosses the threshold of the dark unknown to conjure up
from the vasty deep the awe-struck spirit of some invisible squaw?
"Again,
is it by animal magnetism that he heals the sick? Let us examine. I have
employed electro-magnetism and animal magnetism, and for a brief interval have
felt relief, from the equilibrium which I fancied was restored to an exhausted
system or by a diffusion of concentrated action. But in no instance did I get
rid of a return of all my ailments, because I had not been helped out of the
error in which opinions involved us. My operator believed in disease independent
of the mind; hence, I could not be wiser than my teacher.
But now I can see dimly at first, and only as trees walking, the great
principle which underlies Dr. Quimby's faith and works; and just in proportion
to my light perception of truth is my recovery. This truth which he opposes to
the error of giving intelligence to matter and placing pain where it never
placed itself, if received understandingly, changes the currents of the system
to their normal action; and the mechanism of the body goes on undisturbed. That
this is a science capable of demonstration becomes clear to the minds of those
patients who reason upon the process of their cure.
The truth which he establishes in the patient cures him (although he may
be wholly unconscious thereof) ; and the body, which is full of light, is no
longer in disease. At present I am too much
in error to elucidate the truth, and can touch only the key-note for the master
The
day following the publication of the above article, it was criticized by the Portland
Advertiser; and Mrs. Eddy then wrote a second article, replying to the
criticism. In it appeared the following paragraph, referring to Quimby and his
doctrine:
"P.
P. Quimby stands upon the plane of wisdom with his truth. Christ healed the
sick, but not by jugglery or with drugs. As the former speaks as never man
before spake, and heals as never man healed since. Christ, is he not identified
with truth, and is not this the Christ which is in him? We know that in wisdom
is life, `and the life was the light of man.'
P.
P. Quimby rolls away the stone from the sepulchre of error, and health is the
resurrection. But we also know that `light shineth in darkness, and the darkness
comprehended it not."'
"These
excerpts" says J. A. Dresser, "are in plain language, and they speak
for themselves. The statements are made with too evident an understanding of
their truth to be doubted or questioned, or afterward reversed in any particular.
It should be borne in mind that your speaker was there at the time, and was
familiar with all the circumstances she relates and the views expressed. The
devoted regard the lady formed for her deliverer, Quimby, and for the truth he
taught her, which proved her salvation, was continued to be held by her from
this time (the autumn of 1862) up to a period at least four years later; for in
January, 1866, Quimby's death occurred, and on February 15 she sent to me a copy
of a poem she had written to his memory, and accompanied it by letter."
This
letter, which was published in full in "The True History of Mental
Science," 1887, was both an expression of gratitude and a personal appeal.
Knowing that Mr. Dresser was Quimby's most enthusiastic follower, Mrs. Eddy
expressed the hope that he would take up the work of their much-loved friend.
She then goes on to speak of a fall on the sidewalk which left her momentarily
unconscious.
When
she was brought to, she found herself in a crippled
LINES
ON THE DEATH. OF DR. P. P. QUIMBY, WHO HEALED
WITH
THE TRUTH THAT CHRIST TAUGHT, IN CONTRA
DISTINCTION
TO ALL ISMS.
Did
sackcloth clothe the sun, and day grow night,
All matter mourn the hour with dewy eyes,
When Truth, receding from our mortal sight,
Had paid to error her last sacrifice?
Can we forget the power that gave us life?
Shall we forget the wisdom of its way?
Then ask me not, amid this mortal strife,
This keenest pang of animated, clay,
To mourn him less: to mourn him more were just,
If to his memory 'twere a tribute given
For every solemn, sacred, earnest trust
Delivered to us ere he rose to heaven.
Heaven but the happiness of that calm soul,
Growing in stature to the throne of God:
Rest should reward him who hath made us whole.
Seeking, though tremblers, where his footsteps trod.
LYNN, Feb. 22, 1866. MARY M. PATTERSON.
It
is interesting to realize how much depended on the answer to that letter. Had
Mr. Dresser decided to take up Dr. Quimby's work at that time, no one would have
disputed
On
the other hand, as we have seen above, Mrs. Eddy was for sometime in the throes
of proving Quimby's principle in her own way. With no healer to depend on, she
had to look to that principle alone. She still remained loyal to Quimby. There
is no reason for believing that her attitude toward him changed in any way until
sometime in
Some
allowance must always be made for the personal
The
direct sources were "Questions and Answers," and Vol. 1 of the
manuscripts, supplemented by notes based on the readings and conversations in
Dr. Quimby's office. Given Mrs. Eddy's version of Christian Science as it is to
be found in her various books, in "The Science of Man" and other small
writings, and in the different editions of "Science and Health,"
including the first, the reader will be able to trace out her version of the
Quimby theory from its inception. Given the present volume in its fulness, the
reader will also see what the later version of Christian Science might have been
had Mrs. Eddy enjoyed the benefit of all the Quimby manuscripts. For be later
writings are in various respects correctives of the view which underestimates
the place and reality of the natural world.
It
is not necessary to trace out the changes made in the writings which were in
Mrs. Eddy's possession. The manuscript known as "Questions and
Answers" (1) is the typical
(2) See Appendix page 435.
From
all the evidence before us it is perfectly clear, that until sometime in 1872,
at the close of her intermediate period, Mrs. Eddy maintained her attitude of
loyalty to Quimby as expressed in her letters, 1862-65, and her newspaper
contributions and lectures of those years. We find her in the Stoughton period
still attributing "Questions and Answers" to him without
qualification. After that time, as Miss Milmine has clearly shown, changes in
terminology were gradually introduced, and Dr. Quimby was no longer mentioned as
the writer and discoverer. What followed is not for us to chronicle here.
For
our present purposes it is a question of the gradual development of Dr. Quimby's
own views, which have reached a certain stage of clearness only in the case of
"Questions and Answers." Dr. Quimby was not at his best when thus
answering questions, but rather when giving the silent treatment and
conversing with his patients. While Mrs. Eddy was limited to a few manuscripts,
in so far as she copied or rewrote them for her own purpose as a teacher, she
had also had the benefit of that decisive silent healing and the touch with a
quickening personality which gave her the directive impetus for her own work.
This is the main consideration. And this ought not to be lost sight of in our
interest in tracing the vicissitudes of such a manuscript as "Questions and
Answers."
For
better or worse, that manuscript is Quimby's. We may read it as a secondary
expression of what Quimby
"Question
and Answers," used as the basis for teaching for several years, was the
connecting link. The "Science of Man" stands for another link in the
chain of development, the first and second editions of "Science and
Health" for other links. To understand all these in their connection is to
understand the origin and the various expressions of the later Christian
Science.
